Thread:Talk:OpenDuino/Alternative OpenDuino logins/reply (2)

From syn2cat - HackerSpace.lu
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
* '''IR''' is not a viable alternative in my eyes because the costs involved will not be much higher than a wifi-capable device.
 
* '''IR''' is not a viable alternative in my eyes because the costs involved will not be much higher than a wifi-capable device.
* Bluetooth is almost as bad as rfid in security terms. (And how do you get the code onto your phone in the first place if it isn't wifi capable?)
+
* '''Bluetooth''' is almost as bad as rfid in terms of security. (And how do you get the code onto your phone in the first place if it isn't wifi capable?)

Revision as of 20:14, 23 May 2011

The difference is that with a login, unless someone wrote down his/her password, you can be reasonably sure that the person entering it is the person s/he claims to be. So s/he needs to fulfill both requirements at the same time. However, if you're using a sheet, there is the risk of someone else stealing or finding it and thus not being who s/he claims to be. Ok, chances that this person (if s/he finds the sheet) knows what purpose it serves are rather slim, but not impossible. (my 2cents)

  • IR is not a viable alternative in my eyes because the costs involved will not be much higher than a wifi-capable device.
  • Bluetooth is almost as bad as rfid in terms of security. (And how do you get the code onto your phone in the first place if it isn't wifi capable?)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
syn2cat
Hackerspace
Activities
Initiatives
Community
Tools
Tools