View source for Organisation talk:Syn2cat

==Members==
Should we allow "personne physique" only or also "personne morale" ?
The various associations would be a "personne morale" and their members would automatically be granted access to the hackerspace without paying an additional fee (See [[#Access to the Hackerspace]]). That would require the associations to pay a monthly or annual fee, depending on the number of their members and their level of involvement. --[[User:Kwisatz|kwisatz]] 15:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

==Access to the Hackerspace==
This might be more of an issue for the internal regulations... but how do we handle access to the hackerspace?
This question is also linked to the fees somewhat. Other Hackerspaces have a monthly fee of €20 to €25.
Do we charge associations if they want to hold a venue or not? --[[User:Kwisatz|kwisatz]] 15:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

== Comments ==

Article 3 - contradictory: "à condition que l'idéologie de celui-ci ne conteste les intérêts de l'association" - either we're neutral, or not, we can't be both at the same time. Political neutrality would also mean that we can't use the hackerspace as a platform for issues that mean a lot to us: privacy/data-retention, DRM etc. Of course, if you remove the last clause, various associations could well use the facilities of the hackerspace for these purposes (eg. C3L) ~~====